Human gut bacteria linked to obesity

The obesity epidemic is a massive concern for the 21st century. New research shows that the bacteria that live inside our digestive systems could have a large impact on our risk of being obese.

There is a widespread belief, that being overweight or obese is a question of failing willpower, fuelled in no small part by food, fitness and beauty industries. But if we look at the issue of obesity through a scientific spyglass, a very different picture emerges.

Research is increasingly showing that a large part of the tendency to become obese is genetically controlled, often in very subtle ways. Genetic variation could mean that some people are more sensitive to the smell or sight of food, or are less able to sense when they are full. These small variations can play havoc in our modern environment, where calories are readily available and inactive lifestyles are common.

The microbiota, the bacteria that colonise our gutsBut it’s not just our own genes that we should be worried about. In terms of processing food, humans are hardly self-sufficient. Our guts are the home of trillions of bacteria that help to break down foodstuffs that our own cells cannot cope with. Together the genes expressed by these intestinal comrades outnumber our own by thousands of times, and yet we are still largely in the dark what they do.

Over 90% of these bacteria, collectively known as the microbiota, come from just two groups – the Bacteroidetes and the Firmicutes. Now, new research suggests that the proportion of these groups is an important factor in the obesity epidemic.

Mouse experiments are instrumental in understanding the causes of obesity. Ruth Ley, Peter Turnbaugh, Jeffrey Gordon and colleagues at Washington University first noticed the link between the microbiota and obesity by studying a special strain of fat mice.

These mice lack the hormone leptin, which controls the body’s ‘fat thermostat’. Without it, the mice cannot monitor the amount of fat in their body and quickly become obese through overeating. The team noticed that these mice had 50% fewer Bacteroidetes and 50% more Firmicutes in their bowels than their lean counterparts.

They saw the same thing in humans. The relative proportion of Bacteroidetes increased in obese people as they lost weight through low-fat or low-carbohydrate diets, while the Firmicutes became less abundant.

The link between the microbiota and obesity became even clearer when Gordon looked at a special strain of mice with no microbiota of their own. These intestinal tabula rasas proved to be strongly resistant to the fattening effects of unhealthy diets. After eight weeks on a 40% fat diet, these animals put on less than half as much weight as their normal peers, despite eating the same amount of food.

When the team transplanted the microbiota from fat and lean mice into the germ-free strains, those colonised by microbiota from fat donors packed on far more weight than those paired with lean donors.

To find out why the shifting bacterial balances were affecting body weight, Gordon and co. compared the microbiota of fat and lean mice at a genetic level. Samples from fat mice showed much stronger activation of genes that coded for carbohydrate-destroying enzymes, which break down otherwise indigestible starches and sugars. As a result, these mice were extracting more energy from their food than their lean cousins.

The bacteria were also manipulating the animals’ own genes, triggering biochemical pathways that store fats in the liver and muscles, rather than metabolising them. While these effects are relatively small, Gordon believes that they can lead to very large fluctuations in weight, over the course of months or years.

Obviously, the microbiota are not the whole story behind the obesity epidemic. We now need to understand how they interact with other things that affect our risk of becoming obese, not least of all, our own genes.

And there is much we still don’t know about our life-long passenger, such as how they sense and respond to their host’s condition, how they are passed on, or how they are affected by our diet. By answering these questions, scientists could then assess whether actively shifting our bacterial balances could help to stem the worldwide increase in obesity levels.

Backhed, Manchester, Semenkovich & Gordon. 2006. PNAS 104: 979-984.
Ley, Turnbaugh, Klein & Gordon. 2006. Nature 444: 1022-1023. Turnbaugh, Ley, Mahowald, Magrini, Mardis & Gordon. 2006. Nature 444: 1027-1031.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses

  1. […] Yong has a piece about how bacteria in our guts could be linked to obesity. Have read something about this issue before, too bad I lost the links, none the less Ed makes a […]

  2. There is quite a difference between finding a link between two conditions and finding that one causes the other. The fact that a knockout mouse for the leptin hormone (which produces obese mice by muting their ability to feel satiated and lowering their metabolism) had an altered balance of microbiota suggests instead that it is a symptom, not a cause. At the very most it could be part of a positive feed-back mechanism. This seems to me to be very sloppy science in the service of the diet suppliment industry.

  3. its known that meat producers dose their herds/flocks with antibiotics to promote weight gain, possibly due to analogous alteration of microbiota balance. the obvious human connection is that we ingest the same antibiotics via meat consumption. perhaps we should study the relationship between human obesity and antibiotics exposure, onset of obesity and antibiotic use in modern animal husbandry etc.

  4. fmt,

    You make a very valid point about the correlation between antibiotics and weight gain. Some studies also suggest that there is a higher incidence of cancer in those who have taken antibiotics compared to those who haven’t.

    (For example: breast ( ). It wouldn’t surprise me that antibiotic use might lead to obesity as well. In fact those who are carrying even a few extra pounds have a higher incidence of cancer than those who aren’t.

    We really need to reform our FDA and get more trained nutritionists running it and get the industry leaders and the pharmacologists out of there as they are only going to lobby on behalf of companies to whom they are loyal and not on behalf of citizens.

    Obama said he would dismantle those programs that aren’t working. Clearly, the FDA is not working with so much of our budget being spent on health and and so many unhealthy people. They need to rebuild the FDA with an emphasis on health through prevention and nutrition. It is, after all, the FOOD and drug administration not the DRUG and food administration.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: